Incidence and reasons for discontinuation of first-line therapy in patients with multiple myeloma: results from a historical cohort, Brazil 2009-2020.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological cancer requiring multiple lines of anti-myeloma regimens to promote disease remission and increase patient survival. The study assessed the incidence and reasons for discontinuation of first-line therapy in outpatients who started MM therapy in Belo Horizonte, Brazil from 2009 to 2020. A historical cohort study in which patients were followed from treatment initiation until discontinuation of first-line therapy. Discontinuation of first-line therapy was characterized as (i) discontinuation followed by a second-line therapy, and (ii) discontinuation that prevented patients from receiving a subsequent line of treatment. Non-parametric competing risk analysis with a 95% confidence interval estimated the cumulative incidences of discontinuation followed by a second-line therapy. The probability of discontinuation was compared according to selected variables using the Gray's test at a significance level of 5%. Approximately half of the participants (n = 260) were female and younger than 65 years. Discontinuation of first-line therapy followed by a second-line therapy accounted for 50.4% of the patients and occurred up to 30th month. The main reason for discontinuation not qualifying patients for receiving second-line therapy was to achieve a response to treatment. The maximum times for discontinuation not followed by a second-line therapy ranged from 12 to 20 months due to deaths or response to treatment. The probability of receiving second-line therapy was higher among patients initiating therapy in 2009-2014 and those not undergoing transplantation. In conclusion, discontinuation of first-line therapy followed by second-line treatment occurred as likely as the discontinuation not followed by a subsequent line.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of multiple myeloma treatments based on thalidomide and bortezomib: A retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2020 in a Brazilian metropolis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer of plasma cells; the survival of which has improved over the years with the emergence of new treatments. In Brazil, the availability of treatment-regimens is different from developed countries. Real-world evidence with Brazilian patients is lacking. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of MM treatments in a Brazilian metropolis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study with MM patients, beginning MM treatment from 2009 to 2020 (i.e., before bortezomib became available in public health services). Patients' medical records were revised to obtain clinical variables. The primary outcomes were Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS, measured as time to next treatment), and the secondary outcomes were Adverse Events (AE). Kaplan-Meier curves were obtained and the Cox proportional hazards model was performed for univariate and multivariate analyses. The incidence of AE was estimated and the chi-squared test was performed to evaluate the association between AE and MM regimens. RESULTS: In total, 278 patients participated in the study with median age of 64 years; 50.4 % were females, 55.8 % attended a private clinic, 34.9 % received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 32.4 % were on polypharmacy. Most patients from public services used thalidomide-based regimens (40.3 %) and at private clinics used bortezomib-based regimens (38.1 %) as first-line treatment. Patients had a median OS of 99 months. Patients had median PFS of 28 months in first-line treatment, which was significantly different for age (p = 0.0055), polypharmacy (p = 0.0094) and ASCT (p < 0.0001). PFS was independently associated to polypharmacy and ASCT. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy (39.6 %) was high. In contrast, the incidence of severe AE was low. We found significant difference between first-line T + B-based regimens and leukopenia (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that patients on polypharmacy and who did not receive ASCT had worse PFS. Similar to other Latin countries, most patients used thalidomide- and bortezomib-based regimens as first-line treatments having similar OS and PFS. Treatments were considered relatively safe, especially regarding serious AE.

Use of fall risk-increasing drugs in older adults with multiple myeloma: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of fall risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) and associated factors and to assess the use of medicines that induce neuropathy in older adults with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Cross-sectional study with older adults with MM treated at the outpatient oncology and hematology services in a southeastern Brazilian capital. FRIDs were classified according to the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescription in older adults with high fall risk (STOPPFall). The high risk of falling was defined using the Medication Fall Risk Score scale, and the medicines that induce neuropathy were identified according to Vilholm et al. (2014) and Jones et al. (2019). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to verify the association between variables. RESULTS: Approximately 54.2% of the 153 older adults included in the study were female, and the median age was 70.9 years (IQR = 13; min = 60 and max:92). Around 71.3% used FRIDs, and diuretics (25.6%), antidepressants (20.5%), and opioids (19.9%) were the most used. A total of 32.7% had a high risk of falling. Polypharmacy was associated with a higher risk of using FRIDs. Statins used concomitantly with immunomodulators or bortezomib were the most used neuropathyinducing drugs, increasing fourfold the likelihood of reporting peripheral neuropathy. CONCLUSION: The frequency of use of FRIDs is high in older adults with MM and is positively associated with polypharmacy.

Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Adherence to Treatment With Immunomodulators in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

Background: Validate the Treatment Adherence Measure (TAM) instrument in outpatients with MM concerning construct validity, reliability and the ceiling and floor effects. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients diagnosed with MM previously treated with an immunomodulator for at least one month, aged 18 or over, and followed-up in the investigated outpatient clinics. Adherence to immunomodulators was measured by TAM. The TAM's reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha; The association between adherence and health-related quality of life was investigated to analyze the divergent and convergent construct, measured by the Quality of Life Questionnaire core (QLQ-C30) and the Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma module (QLQ-MY20). The presence of a ceiling or floor effect in the TAM was also analyzed. Results: Eighty-four patients were included in the study, achieving 97.6% adherence. Cronbach's alpha was 0.41, and the hypothesis of convergent construct validity was confirmed, with statistical significance, in contrast to the hypothesis of divergent construct validity. The presence of the ceiling effect in TAM suggested that this instrument does not allow changes to be detected in individuals concerning adherence to IMiDs. Conclusion: TAM instrument did not show satisfactory validity and reliability to measure MM's adherence. MM patients treated at oncohematological outpatient clinics in a metropolitan region of southeastern Brazil showed high adherence to IMiDs.

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness and acceptability among trans women: a review.

Transgender (trans) women are disproportionally burdened by the HIV epidemic due to complex structural, psychosocial and biological factors. HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a biomedical prevention approach for people at substantial risk of acquiring HIV. This literature review assessed awareness, willingness to use, and barriers and facilitators for PrEP acceptability among trans women. A search was conducted through five databases and included studies with primary data and disaggregate results for trans women. Of 255 retrieved citations, 17 met the inclusion criteria and were included. Low to moderate knowledge about PrEP was observed among studies. However, willingness to use PrEP was predominantly high. Frequent barriers to PrEP acceptability included concerns about side effects, cost, hormone therapy, adherence, PrEP-related stigma and interaction with healthcare workers. Facilitators included perceived reduction of HIV risk, fear of HIV/AIDS and reduced dependence on partners. Findings suggest elevated interest in PrEP and highlight important barriers and facilitators that should be specifically addressed to optimize PrEP uptake and use among this highly vulnerable population.

Effectiveness of second-line antiretroviral therapy: the impact of drug switches.

Including antiretroviral drug switches as a measure of ART failure could be more suitable than conventional measures to evaluate health outcomes in "real-world" settings. This is part of a historical cohort of HIV-infected adults who initiated ART from 2001-2005, and were followed up for a maximum of five years in three HIV/AIDS centers in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Follow-up information included data from 2001-2010. All patients switched from first-line ART were included. Second-line ART effectiveness was measured as the time-to-ART failure. Failure was defined simulating two scenarios: (1) Clinical, immunological and virological failure (scenario 1); and scenario 1 plus ART switches (scenario 2). Descriptive analysis, Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model were performed. We identified 119 eligible patients; most had protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens prescribed as second-line. The incidence of failure was different for the two scenarios (29.4% vs. 54.6% for scenario 1 and 2, respectively; p < 0.001). The main identifiers of failure were increase in viral load (31.1%) for scenario 1 and ART switches (42.8%) for scenario 2. Median duration on second-line ART was 36.8 vs. 19.8 months for scenario 1 and 2, respectively. In the Cox analysis of scenario 2, increased risk was found for patients given PI-based second-line regimens (HR = 2.26; 95% CI: 1.09-3.17). There is a high incidence of ART failure associated with PI-based regimens when ART switches are considered as an indicator of failure. This demonstrates the impact of ART switches in representing lack of ART effectiveness.

Evaluation of primary health care by users and non-users of drugs hospitalized for primary care-sensitive conditions / Evaluación de la atención primaria por los usuarios y no usuarios de medicamentos hospitalizados por condiciones sensibles al cuidado ambulatorio

No disponible